No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result
No Result
View All Result

Key Indicator- 2.3 Enhancing Learning Experiences (50)

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.3.1. Student-centric methods are used for enhancing learning experiences by:
  • Experiential learning
  • Integrated/interdisciplinary learning
  • Participatory learning
  • Problem solving methodologies
  • Self-directed learning
  • Patient-centric and Evidence-Based Learning
  • Learning in the Humanities
  • Project-based learning
  • Role play
 10
2.3.2 Institution facilitates the use of Clinical Skills Laboratory / Simulation Based Learning The Institution:
  1. has Basic Clinical Skills / Simulation Training Models and Trainers for skills in the relevant disciplines.
  2. has advanced simulators for simulation-based training
  3. has structured programs for training and assessment of students in Clinical Skills Lab / Simulation based learning.
  4. Conducts training programs for the faculty in the use of clinical skills lab and simulation methods of teaching-learning
 10
2.3.3 Teachers use ICT-enabled tools for effective teaching and learning process including online e-resources Response to be provided within 500 words 10
2.3.4 Student : Mentor Ratio (preceding academic year) Data Requirement:
  • Number of mentors
  • Number of students assigned to each Mentor
Formula: Mentor : Mentee Ratio = Number of mentors : Number of students assigned to each Mentor		 10
2.3.5 The teaching-learning process of the institution nurtures creativity, analytical skills, and innovation among students. Describe the process by providing examples to illustrate the development of creativity, analytical skills, and innovation among students within 500 words 5

Key Indicator- 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (20)

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.1.1. Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness by providing reservation of seats to all categories during the admission process. Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years Average percentage of students admitted from the reserved categories as per GOI or State Government norms year-wise during the last five years 20
2.1.2 Average percentage of seats filled in for the various programmes as against the approved intake Number of seats filled-in for various programmes offered by the College as against the approved intake during the last five years: Year Number of seats filled in UG: PG: Super Specialty : Number of approved seats UG: PG: Super Specialty : Formula: Percentage per year = (Number of seats filled in for the various programmes / Number of approved seats for the same programme) x 100 Average percentage = (Percentage per year for all five years) / 5 10
2.1.3 Average percentage of Students enrolled demonstrates a national spread and includes students from other states Number of students enrolled from other states year-wise during the last five years Year Number of students enrolled from other states Total number of students enrolled in the specified year Formula: Percentage per year = (Number of students enrolled from other states / Total number of students enrolled in the specified year) x 100 5

Key Indicator- 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (25)

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.2.1. The Institution assesses the learning levels of the students, after admission and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow performers The Institution:
  1. Follows measurable criteria to identify slow performers
  2. Follows measurable criteria to identify advanced learners
  3. Organizes special programmes for slow performers
  4. Follows protocol to measure student achievement
 25
2.2.2. Student - Fulltime teacher ratio (data for the preceding academic year) Data Requirement:
  • Total number of students enrolled in the College
  • Total number of fulltime teachers in the College
Formula: No. of Students : No. of full time Teachers		 5
2.2.3 Institution facilitates building and sustenance of innate talent/aptitude of individual students (extramural activities/beyond the classroom activities such as student clubs, cultural societies, etc) Describe the initiatives to facilitate innate talent/aptitude of individual students (extramural activities/beyond the classroom activities such as student clubs, cultural societies, etc) within 500 words. Provide web link to appropriate documentary evidence ---

Key Indicator- 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (50)

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.4.1. Average percentage of fulltime teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years Data Requirement for the last five years:
  • Number of fulltime teachers
  • Number of sanctioned posts
Formula: Percentage per year = (Number of fulltime teachers / Number of sanctioned posts) x 100		 10
2.4.2. Average percentage of fulltime teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc./D.Lit./DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialties/other PG degrees (like MD/MS/MDS etc.,) in Health Sciences (like MD/MS/MDS etc.,) for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils/Affiliating Universities. Number of fulltime teachers with Ph.D/D.Sc./D.Lit./DM/M Ch/DNB in super specialties/other PG degrees in Health Sciences (like MD/MS/MDS etc.,) for recognition as Ph.D guides as per the eligibility criteria stipulated by the Regulatory Councils. Last five years data to be entered. 10
2.4.3. Average Teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years (data for the preceding academic year) Average teaching experience of full-time teachers (cadre-wise) in number of years. Data Requirement:
  • List of fulltime teachers with number of years of teaching experience
Formula: Sum total of teaching experience of fulltime teachers in the preceding academic year / Number of fulltime teachers in the preceding academic year		 10
2.4.4. Average percentage of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-content/e-courses during the last 5 years Data Requirement for the last five years:
  • Number of fulltime teachers in the Institution during the last 5 years
  • Number of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-content/e-courses during the last 5 years
Formula: Percentage per year = (Number of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-content/e-courses / Number of fulltime teachers in the Institution during the last 5 years) x 100		 10
2.4.5 Average Percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence in teaching, student mentoring, scholarships, professional achievements, and academic leadership at State, National, International levels from Government / Government-recognized agencies / registered professional associations / academies during the last five years Data Requirement for last five years:
  • List of fulltime teachers who received awards etc., from State, National, International levels from Govt. and Govt. – recognized agencies
Formula: Percentage per year = (Number of teachers who received awards etc., / Number of fulltime teachers) x 100		 10

Key Indicator- 2.5 Academic Calendar and Evaluation (45)

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.5.1. The Institution adheres to the academic calendar for the conduct of Continuous Internal Evaluation and ensures that it is robust and transparent Provide a description within 500 words 10
2.5.2. Mechanism to deal with examination-related grievances is transparent, time-bound, and efficient Provide a description on Grievance redressal mechanism with reference to continuous internal evaluation, matters relating to University examination for submission of appeals, providing access to answer scripts, provision of re-totaling and provision for re-assessment within 500 words 15
2.5.3. Reforms in the process and procedure in the conduct of evaluation/examination; including the automation of the examination system Describe the reforms implemented in internal evaluation/ examinations with reference to the following within 500 words:
  • Examination procedures
  • Processes integrating IT
  • Continuous internal assessment system
  • Competency-based assessment
  • Workplace-based assessment
  • Self-assessment
  • OSCE/OSPE
 10
2.5.4. The Institution provides opportunities to students for midcourse improvement of performance through specific interventions Opportunities provided to students for midcourse improvement of performance through:
  • Timely administration of CIE
  • On-time assessment and feedback
  • Makeup assignments/tests
  • Remedial teaching/support
 10

Key Indicator- 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcome (45)

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.6.1. The Institution has stated the learning outcomes (generic and programme-specific) and graduate attributes as per the provisions of the Regulatory bodies and the University;which are communicated to the students and teachers through the website and other documents Provide details of the stated learning outcomes for each programme / course as stipulated by the appropriate Regulatory bodies and the University and the methods followed by the Institution for assessment of the same within 500 words. 10
2.6.2 Incremental performance in Pass percentage of final year students in the last five years Data Requirement:
  • Number of final year students of all the programmes, who have qualified in the university examinations in each of the last five years.
  • Number of final year students of all the programmes, who appeared for the examinations in each of the last five years.
 15
2.6.3 The teaching learning and assessment processes of the Institution are aligned with the stated learning outcomes. Provide details on how teaching learning and assessment processes are mapped to achieve the generic and program-specific learning outcomes (for each program) within 500 words. 10
2.6.4 Presence and periodicity of parent-teachers meetings, remedial measures undertaken, and outcome analysis Describe structured mechanism for parent-teachers meetings, follow-up action taken and outcome analysis within 500 words 10

Key Indicator- 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey (50)

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.7.1. Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process Data Requirement: (As per Data Template)
  • Name/Class/Gender
  • Student Id Number
  • Mobile number
  • Email Id
  • Degree Programme
 10
No Result
View All Result