Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership (10)
Metric No. | Metric | Weightage |
---|---|---|
6.1.1 | The Institution has clearly stated Vision and Mission which are reflected in its academic and administrative governance. Describe the Vision and Mission of the Institution, nature of governance, perspective plans, and stakeholders’ participation in the decision-making bodies highlighting the activities leading to Institutional excellence. Response to be provided within 500 words. | 5 |
6.1.2 | Effective leadership is reflected in various Institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management. Describe the organogram of the college management structure and its functioning system highlighting decentralized and participatory management and its outcomes in the Institutional governance within 500 words. | 5 |
Key Indicator – 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment (10)
Metric No. | Metric | Weightage |
---|---|---|
6.2.1 | The Institution has a well-defined organizational structure, Statutory Bodies/committees of the College with relevant rules, norms, and guidelines along with Strategic Plan effectively deployed. Provide the write-up within 500 words. | 5 |
6.2.2 |
Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation:
Upload:
|
5 |
Key Indicator – 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies (30)
Metric No. | Metric | Weightage |
---|---|---|
6.3.1 |
The Institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff. Provide web link to:
|
5 |
6.3.2 |
Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards the membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years. Data Requirement for the last five years: (As per Data Template)
Formula: Percentage per year = (Number of teachers who attended such program in a year / Total number of fulltime teachers in that year) × 100 Average percentage = Total percentage per year / 5 Upload:
|
7 |
6.3.3 |
Average number of professional development/administrative training programs organized by the Institution for teaching and non-teaching/technical staff during the last five years. Data Requirement for the last five years: (As per Data Template)
Formula: Total number of professional development and administrative training programs organized for teaching, non-teaching, and technical staff during the last five years / 5 Upload:
|
6 |
6.3.4 |
Average percentage of teachers undergoing Faculty Development Programs (FDP) including online programs during the last five years (Orientation/Induction Programs, Refresher Course, Short Term Course, etc.). Data Requirement for the last five years: (As per Data Template)
Formula: Percentage per year = (Number of teachers who have attended such program in a year / Total number of fulltime teachers in that year) × 100 Average percentage = Total percentage per year / 5 Upload:
|
10 |
6.3.5 |
Institution has Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff. Describe the functioning of the Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff within 500 words. Provide web link to:
|
6 |
Key Indicator – 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization (20)
Metric No. | Metric | Weightage |
---|---|---|
6.4.1 |
Institutional strategies for mobilization of funds and the optimal utilization of resources. Describe the resource mobilization policy and procedures for optimal utilization of resources within 500 words. Provide web link to:
|
7 |
6.4.2 |
Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly. Enumerate the various internal and external financial audits carried out during the last five years with the mechanism for settling any audit objections within 500 words. Provide web link to:
|
8 |
6.4.3 |
Funds/Grants received from government/non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists (INR in Lakhs) during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III). Total Grants received from government/non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists year-wise during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) Year Funds/grants received from government bodies (INR in Lakhs) Funds/grants received from non-government bodies (INR in Lakhs) Upload:
|
5 |
Key Indicator – 6.5 Internal Quality Assurance System (30)
Metric No. | Metric | Weightage |
---|---|---|
6.5.1 |
Institution has a streamlined Internal Quality Assurance Mechanism. Describe the Internal Quality Assurance Mechanism in the Institution and the activities of IQAC within 500 words. Provide web link to:
|
10 |
6.5.2 |
Average percentage of teachers attending programs/workshops/seminars specific to quality improvement in the last 5 years. Number of quality initiatives by IQAC for promoting quality year-wise for the last five years Year Number of Quality Improvement programs Number of teachers who attended such programs Percentage per year = (Number of teachers who have attended such IQAC programs in a year / Total number of teachers in that year) × 100 Average percentage = Total percentage per year / 5 Upload:
|
10 |
6.5.3 |
The Institution adopts several Quality Assurance initiatives. The Institution has implemented the following QA initiatives:
Upload:
|
6 |